Jun 03, 2023

If you want to request permissions, please create an account or login, and then do so here. Please be sure to follow our policies. Welcome!

TestWiki:Community portal

From TestWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to For-Test Wiki's community portal. This is the page where the community discusses issues, questions, and other topics pertaining to For-Test Wiki. The main functions of this portal are as follows:

  • to request advanced rights like steward and suppressor;
  • to start a discussion on making and amending the policies;
  • to request sysop/bureaucrats rights to be removed from users in accordance to the inactivity policy.

If you want to request steward actions, use the Stewards' noticeboard. If you are here to request a new extension/skin, report bugs, or any other changes that requires the assistance of a system administrator, use the System administrators' noticeboard instead.

Archives: 1 2

Upgrade to MediaWiki 1.39

Hi, I am happy to announce that the upgrade of the recently released LTS version of MediaWiki, MediaWiki 1.39.0 have been launched by the sysadmin team. Should you encountered any bugs or issues, please report it here in the community portal. Happy testing for all! -Matttestzh (talk) 07:47, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Requesting steward rights - Elijah Wilder

Inactive user

Any steward, you may wish to remove permissions from User:🫥 under the Inactivity Policy. Justarandomamerican (talk) 14:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Requesting suppressor rights - Justarandomamerican

Inactivity Report 03/30/23

Hello All,

The following user's rights should be removed in accordance with the inactivity policy.

  1. User:Airtransat236
  2. User:Arkadiy
  3. User:Buel
  4. User:Kristiannumber1
  5. User:Lolkikmoddi
  6. User:Testing999999999

Thank you for all of your previous contributions to For Test Wiki! You can request your rights be kept below, or re-request them at here. X (talk) 17:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

I've set grace periods for the accounts that only have sysop. @Matttestzh: Can you do the crats? Justarandomamerican (talk) 16:20, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
All the accounts will have their rights being automatically removed at 7 April if they don’t have logged actions for the next 2 days. Thank you @X: and @Justarandoamerican: for assistance on this process. -Matttestzh (talk) 07:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
You're welcome! - (TalkContributions) 10:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Requesting a formal blocking policy

I think we should have a formal blocking policy, such as this, which goes into detail about different types of blocks. Keep in mind that the proposed policy linked is a draft, and may be edited as necessary. Justarandomamerican (talk) 00:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Support. This is needed and should be made an official policy. X (talk) 00:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose, sadly. I would personally against on creating a too specific policy like Wikipedia (e.g. protection policy, testing policy, abuse filter policy, etc) as we are just a test wiki project. I have proposed a new testing policy, so that it only limits testing actions. For formal protection, blocks, and conduct behavior, we can actually put them in another policy page. Would that be better? -Matttestzh (talk) 07:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
I think that would work better. Just so we have something in place. - (TalkContributions) 10:20, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
That's good with me, I just think we should have something more comprehensive, covering serious actions. Justarandomamerican (talk) 12:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Note: I have created a potential non-test actions policy here. What do you all think? Justarandomamerican (talk) 20:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
I think the policy is a good supplement to our current policies, and I support making it official. If more crats agree with this, I think it can be made official. - (TalkContributions) 20:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
I have made some minor modifications to the policy and added a section of behavioral guidelines. I think it can be made official if other crats support this. -Matttestzh (talk) 03:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Requesting suppressor rights - X

Extension request

Hi, would it be possible to add the Who's Online extension here so that I can [[Special:WhosOnline|transclude it]] into the recent changes' text? Thanks! Username (talk) 02:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done, users should remain anonymous to all other users. Privacy is one of the most important foundation of our wiki. -Matttestzh (talk) 03:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Interface admin rights changes

Would it be possible for interface admins to add interface admin rights and add restricted filter actions, because there aren't enough active stewards who can do the aforementioned actions? Thanks, Zippybonzo (talk) 17:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

I agree that Interface Admins should be able to grant interface administrator rights to other users, but I believe restricted filter actions should be given to bureaucrats. - (TalkContributions) 17:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
It would also be helpful if there was some form of permission manager role that could grant suppressor, interface admin, bureaucrat, and admin, and then also remove all of those groups, because it's hard to remove rights from users that aren't constructively editing. Zippybonzo (talk) 17:56, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
I agree, but I think there should be elections for this role, as opposed to at the permissions page. - (TalkContributions) 22:16, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
I think that we should wait and see if this group is needed. Given that there's pretty strong consensus that I should become a Steward, let's see what happens in terms of user rights management once that request is closed. Justarandomamerican (talk) 22:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
I agree. You will be able to handle a lot of the backlog of unfulfilled requests when you become a steward. I wish Matttest would have approved you when they were online because they are really busy. - (TalkContributions) 22:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
I'm not too sure why he didn't close it whilst he was online, since there's strong community consensus. Maybe he wanted to review me myself? (Note: the he pronouns are based off the fact that their name is "Matt", aka Matthew, feel free to correct me.) Justarandomamerican (talk) 13:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Requesting steward rights - Justarandomamerican

Requesting suppressor rights - Zippybonzo

Sockpuppet abuse filter

I have done some tinkering and our abuse filter for sock puppets is now operational. Feel free to add other username strings to the list. - (TalkContributions) 12:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Bureaucrat unblockself

My testing indicates that the Bureaucrat right alone doesn’t permit you to unblockself. Zippybonzo (talk) 21:20, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

I am not sure what your testing showed, but you can see Special:ListGroupRights and see that bureaucrats have the ability to unblock themselves, no matter if they are administrators. Unrelated, but I think your suppressor rights request can be closed, as I doubt any more positive feedback will arise. I can close it as "No consensus" meaning that some users supported, some opposed, but no agreement was reached to make you a suppressor. If you do not object, I plan to close it soon. If you disagree with my closure, always feel free to revert and wait for a closure by steward, although given the only steward weakly opposed your request, I doubt it will be any different.
UPDATE:I have created/updated a filter to stop this if you want to test. It is filter #14 if you want to take a peek. - (TalkContributions) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
@X: You aren’t able to unblock yourself as a crat as you can’t access the unblock interface, nor can you change rights, so there isn’t anything a rogue crat account could do. Also, about your closure, the fact that a steward opposed it doesn’t make it instant no consensus, as stewards don’t have seniority in discussions. Thanks, Zippybonzo (talk) 08:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
@Zippybonzo: Okay, thanks for testing that. I have also done some testing and I agree with you. I hope you have a better close from a steward. Good luck! - (TalkContributions) 10:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Community ban for User:ApexAgunomu

Note: ApexAgunomu is free to create an unblock appeal and choose whether it should be considered by us here at the community portal, or Matttestzh. Justarandomamerican (talk) 16:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

ApexAgonomu Block Appeal

Because this discussion was closed early, any registered user may raise an objection to either its closure or raise an argument against Apex being unblocked anytime. Justarandomamerican (talk) 17:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Admin Request

I tried asking this on the Request Permissions page,but the guidance filter stopped me. Can I please have the administrator role? Thanks! ApexAgunomu (talk) 17:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially the Testing policy. Failure to do so may result in your rights being revoked, or in severe cases, you being blocked. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask at Community portal or on the talk page of any steward. Happy testing! -- - (TalkContributions) 17:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC) - (TalkContributions) 17:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Name Change Request

Hi, can my name be changed to Piccadilly please? Thank you! ApexAgunomu (talk) 18:24, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

LGTM, @Matttestzh: go ahead and rename. Justarandomamerican (talk) 18:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done. While I am not a steward that can actually fufill your request, I don't think you should be renamed. Your current username/account has strict restrictions on requesting permissions and other restrictions. Renaming may cause confusion. Your current username also shows an association with your other blocked accounts on other projects. I don't think it is best to rename you at this time. - (TalkContributions) 18:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
I can see your reasoning. I was thinking initially: Meh, it'll just redirect. I probably won't approve of renaming restricted users in the future. Justarandomamerican (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
I think not renaming blocked/restricted users is a good idea. - (TalkContributions) 13:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

CentralAuth extension

Can we have CentralAuth installed across fortestwiki and fortestwikibeta for testing? Zippybonzo (talk) 13:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Why? We are a single wiki, not a wiki farm or group of wikis like Wikipedia or Miraheze. - (TalkContributions) 11:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
More for testing of locking and unlocking and global permissions over fortestwiki and fortestwiki beta. It would also mean fortestwikibeta gets used more often. Zippybonzo (talk) 18:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
myht (the wiki provider) can't handle centralauth because it takes up a lot of space and if a webpage takes up too much space it might get deleted, to ensure the proper functioning of all service sites. AlPaD (talk) 18:31, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Request for Bureaucrat - ApexAgunomu

  • Status:  Done
  • User: Piccadilly (talkcontribsdeletedlogsrights)
  • Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
  • Reason for requesting: For further testing and also to help handle any serious issues that may come up. I am aware that the community will need to discuss this before it can be approved.

ApexAgunomu (talk) 22:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

I have no issues with this request, but it will only be approved once @Justarandomamerican: is made a steward. - (TalkContributions) 22:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Just curious, why do we need to wait until then? ApexAgunomu (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
To be quite honest, the bureaucrat team doesn’t really trust you. We would prefer that, just in case you revert to your old ways, we have an active steward to remove your rights. I hope you understand. - (TalkContributions) 22:45, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, I can understand the team not trusting me yet. I hope that with time and continued good decisions on my part the trust issue can eventually be put aside. ApexAgunomu (talk) 23:01, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
I hope so too, but it takes time to regain the trust that you have lost. Keep editing productively and I have no doubt you can become a bureaucrat when Justa is made a steward. - (TalkContributions) 23:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
I support your genuine effort to show that you can contribute positively. There's no need to worry about the request being genuinely denied due to lack of measures to prevent potential abuse, mostly because we're practically waiting for community consensus to be enacted, the discussion above looks clear to me. I'll probably ping Matttestzh as a notification for whenever he comes online. Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
+1 to that. - (TalkContributions) 23:48, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
@Justarandomamerican:. This request I think can actually be approved now. My testing shows that blocked bureaucrats without admin permissions cannot edit, unblock themselves, or grant rights. I will hear your opinion first though. - (TalkContributions) 15:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 Sounds good to me. Justarandomamerican (talk) 02:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 Done. Please ensure you continue to follow all of our policies because bureaucrat is a more senior and trusted testing permission. The stewards are the ultimate non-test administrators on For-Test Wiki and guide this wiki with the community at TestWiki:Community portal. When granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. -- - (TalkContributions) 10:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
I noticed you created a page with “Hi people” and then deleted it as a test. Given that you have before replaced the people with various derogatory terms, I advise you to please not do so. - (TalkContributions) 02:09, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
I definitely will not be repeating any derogatory words here, I promise. ApexAgunomu (talk) 03:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Good! Your behavior here so far has been good. - (TalkContributions) 17:18, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Rights removal request

Any available steward may want to set bureaucrat rights to a grace period of 1 week for the following user. They have not edited since mid-February and their only logged action was a failed massmessage about 1 month ago.

Thanks! - (TalkContributions) 17:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Oppose, a failed massmessage is still a logged action, so I would set a grace period in one and a bit months. Zippybonzo (talk) 19:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Why would we set a grace period for over a month when the user hasn't performed a logged action in 25 days. Our inactivity policy states 1 month, unlike other wikis Zippybonzo. - (TalkContributions) 19:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
It was 3 months and you removed the section about that arbitrarily and either way, they have made logged actions other than creating an account and it doesn’t mention anything about edits/logged actions in your revision. I appreciate that you would like to help the wiki, but removing permissions from users contrary to policy is not something I would call constructive. I understand the security concerns/implications, but the removal of rights against policy is not governed by policy. Zippybonzo (talk) 17:07, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
No, it has always been 1 month, but there was a weird section that was meaningless about 3 months, that makes no sense because if they haven't performed any actions in 1 month, they won't have performed any actions in 3 months. I still think that a 1 week grace period is appropriate for security here. - (TalkContributions) 17:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
It’s not, if a user makes no edits or logged actions in 1 month except for requesting rights, then the rights are removed. If a user makes no edits or logged actions in 3 months, but they have made edits other than requesting permissions before the no edits period, then they get rights removed. It’s very confusing and I’m tempted to just make it 3 months for all, but it’s open to interpretation, I’m willing for a 1 month grace period, but it’s pointless anyway, as they can grant sysop back to themselves. Zippybonzo (talk) 17:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
I agree that it is too confusing and we should just make it a single time, I think we meet in the middle for 2 months. What do you think? I have also granted Elijah Wilder their rights back indefinitely while we get this figured out. - (TalkContributions) 17:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Change inactivity time

Abuse filter noticeboard

I have created a new [[TestWiki:Abuse filter noticeboard]], where you can request abuse filters, or changes to current ones, or general administration of abuse filters, there will also be a list of new filters. I have created a new filter to stop your mom vandalism, which having typed that will set off the filter, if you need any filters making, I have a decent understanding of regex, which is enough for me to create some filters if requested. Let me know if you need anything filter based, as I am likely able to help you. Zippybonzo (talk) 19:31, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for creating this! - (TalkContributions) 22:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Requesting steward rights - X

Requesting Multiple Sysadmin Actions

Can the FlaggedRevs extension, the UserGroups extension (if it works) and the Thanks extension be installed. (Some were taken from other threads) and can the following user group rights changes occur.

  1. Add the following rights to the interface admin group, 'abusefilter-modify-restricted','oathauth-enable' and the following parameters relating to the interface-admin group,

'$wgAddGroups ['interface-admin'][] 'interface-admin'; '$wgAddGroups ['interface-admin'][] 'interwiki-admin'; '$wgAddGroups ['interface-admin'][] 'abusefilter'; '$wgRemoveGroups ['interface-admin'][] 'interwiki-admin'; '$wgRemoveGroups ['interface-admin'][] 'abusefilter';

  1. Create the following group 'abusefilter' with the rights, 'abusefilter-view-private','abusefilter-modify'.
  2. Remove all abuse filter related rights from the admin group except AbuseFilter log viewing and viewing of non private.
  3. Remove the ability for bureaucrats to grant or remove interwiki admin and AbuseFilter, and leave those to interface admins with more technical ability.
  4. Also, merge the CheckUser and suppressor rights into the steward right to allow for oversight of those logs to prevent abuse.
  5. Try to allow sysadmins to manage user groups onwiki when possible through the UserGroups extension.

Zippybonzo (talk) 17:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss below:

Agree to interface administrators being able to add other I-Admins, disagree on the creation of a dedicated AbuseFilter group, as it seems those rights belong with Administrators, as this is a test wiki, so test abuse filters should be able to be created. Disagree on interwiki only being an I-Admin thing, as a general "if it isn't broke, don't fix it" sort of thing, nobody has abused Interwiki, nor is there a high potential for abuse at the moment (most of us are knowledgeable enough as to hover over links). Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
I agree with interface admins being able to grant interface admin rights to other users, but I don't think that bureaucrats should be not allowed to grant IW admin rights. I disagree with the abuse filter group because we are a testwiki and users should be able to test with abuse filters. I am fine with giving stewards access to the CU and OV tools automatically, but I don't think the suppressor groups should be removed so non-stewards can be granted those rights. - (TalkContributions) 23:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Once consensus here is established, please make a request on the TestWiki:System administrators' noticeboard. - (TalkContributions) 11:34, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Requesting steward rights - Zippybonzo

Main Page protection reason

Right now, the protection reason for the main page says "Should not be edited without community consensus". If someone is elected a steward, they should be able to make changes at their discretion, instead of going through the discussion process every time the main page needs an edit, which is why this protection reason is wrong, it's protected to prevent disruptive changes to the most visible page on the wiki, not because every change to it should require community consensus, correct? Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Change the reason to “High traffic page”. - (TalkContributions) 23:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
I'd agree. Changing. Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Request for Lifting of Restrictions

Hello, I would like to request a lifting of the editing and user rights restrictions that are currently in place for me. I understand that I still need to be careful in my behavior here and to obey all the rules here. I would like to have the restrictions lifted so I can get my name changed to Piccadilly, which I would like to have done. Thank you. ApexAgunomu (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Support removing rights restrictions, oppose removing editing restrictions and rename. Your rights restrictions prevent you from requesting IA without community discussion. I support removing this. Your editing restrictions basically make it that upon any disruption, you can be blocked immediately by any administrator for any reason. I don’t support removing this quite yet. Because of this, I also oppose a rename. @Justarandomamerican:: Your opinion on this would be appreciated. - (TalkContributions) 02:50, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
I have removed your user rights restrictions, but the editing restrictions I would like @Justarandomamerican:’s opinion on. - (TalkContributions) 23:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Remove editing restrictions: I think at this point it's enough to go through the normal process of administrative discretion regarding consequences for disruptive behavior, such as a warning to deter, a block to prevent, etc. I think it's enough to trust our friendly bureaucrats and ourselves on what to do if Apex does not follow the policies at this moment. If disruptive behavior resumes and refuses to stop, the restrictions should be put back into place. Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 Done and renamed. - (TalkContributions) 23:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Check user findings regarding ApexAgunomu

Per check user evidence, Apex has not operated the -eium sockpuppets or any other account or IP since their block, as far as I can tell. This should confirm that they have changed and not reverted back to their past behavior. I have also checked the -eium accounts and they are, no surprise, operated by the same user. - (TalkContributions) 02:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

I have also found that the REAL Zippybonzo account is a  Confirmed sockpuppet of the -eium accounts. I will be changing the block reasons soon. - (TalkContributions) 12:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Call for System Administrator

Dear For Test Wiki Editors,

I am putting out a call for any user who would wish to be a system administrator, as we desperately need one, if anyone wants to nominate me, feel free, but we really need a sysadmin to handle the extension backlog. Please note, you must be an active bureaucrat with familiarity of MariaDB, PHP and MediaWiki to become a sysadmin. Thanks, Zippybonzo (talk) 20:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

I would be willing to become one, but my knowledge of MariaDB is small, although I am definitely willing to learn. I am really familiar with the MediaWiki software and am very active bureaucrat. - (TalkContributions) 20:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
I would also be willing to come one, however I’m not the best with MariaDB as my testing wiki runs on MySQL, but I’m familiar with PHP and how MediaWiki works. Zippybonzo (talk) 05:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

This is ApexAgunomu and I can't log in

Hi, I am ApexAgunomu and I had been logged into here until just now. I tried logging into the wiki again but it wouldn't accept my password (which I have not changed recently). I don't have an email attached to my account-what can I do? I'm 99% sure I have the right password. (Information redacted) 00:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

I have renamed you as requested. - (TalkContributions) 00:09, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Thank you. I have been rather inactive here today so I didn't realize I had had my name change granted. Thanks once again! Piccadilly (talk) 00:13, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Unblocking Username and editing restrictions

Hello, FTW community! I am writing to document my unblock of Username and the user restrictions accompanying it. For context, I blocked Username as a steward action for lack of communication and encouraged him to discuss it with the stewards on his talk page. He has yet to do so, and based on previous behavior, I doubt he ever will. I feel a bit sad about this, but I want to do what's best for the community. What I feel is best, upon reflection, is to unblock Username and grant his sysop rights back. This would be followed by a notice on his user talk page that he must gain community consensus before performing large or controversial actions. Username's bureaucrat rights may be re-granted in 1 week following this post, at the user's request, following improvement in behavior/communication. They will again be reminded to seek discussion before performing large or controversial actions. Now for Interface administrator rights. These will be granted back following a community discussion that may take place no earlier than 10 days from 11:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC). Improvement in communication/discussion must be shown for these to be granted back. If Username violates the conditions above and performs large or controversial actions without discussion, any sysop may block them for 24 hours with TPA enabled. This should give stewards enough time to review the situation and make a decision on what to do. I strongly encourage Username to take the advice given to him and acknowledge that communication is required.

For the steward team,

- (TalkContributions) 11:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

This sounds like a good plan to me. Piccadilly (talk) 12:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Glad you think so! - (TalkContributions) 12:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC)


I'd like to propose an amendment to MediaWiki:Common.css. It's a simple one, the script of StaffHighlights.css would merge into this one and that one would be deleted. Username (talk) 20:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Oh, and nothing will change. I promise! I just think it's unnecessary to even have StaffHighlights.css as an existing gadget when I've seen it work FAR better under common.css in other wikis. Username (talk) 20:32, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Are you aware that if this happens, you will no longer be able to alter the script, as you could before. It is currently protected at steward level. Other than that, I am not strictly opposed to the idea. - (TalkContributions) 20:41, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Yes, I'm aware that I'll no longer be able to alter the script afterwards. And that I must propose a new amendment in a new section. Username (talk) 15:38, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for confirming this. This is  Done. - (TalkContributions) 16:21, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Alright, thanks! But I think you forgot to remove a tiny instance of this defunct gadget here. Username (talk) 16:26, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I have removed that line from the gadgets page. I hope this is what you meant. - (TalkContributions) 16:31, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Reforming of noticeboards

Since there are more and more requests flooding into the community portal, the following measures are taken in response:

  • all extension/skin requests are to be directed to the System administrators' noticeboard;
  • all checkuser requests, renaming requests or any other requests that requires steward action should be directed to the Stewards' noticeboard. Stewards should also make follow-up announcements to the community to it (e.g. CheckUser findings).

Also, I propose the withdrawal of the [[TestWiki:Bureaucrats' noticeboard]] and [[TestWiki:Abuse filter noticeboard]]. As the bureaucrat right is mainly for testing, there is no reason whatsoever for this noticeboard to exist. In case of requests of serious blocks/protection, they should be placed on the Stewards' noticeboard instead. The abusefilter also have the function to make notes during a change. If the proposed change of the abuse filter is major, they should be proposed here for the attention of the community. Regards, Matttestzh (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

 Deleted. I agree with all the points/changes you have made. - (TalkContributions) 11:10, 26 May 2023 (UTC)